Actualizaciones Recientes
  • The Direct Capetians, essentially. Louis the Lion. Charles of Anjou had an older brother. Artois. The others are between the Direct Capetians. And Artois. Which are inherited. Bourbon-Artois. Dynastic order. Law.

    Henry II аnd Henry III. Edward III.

    "Not because We are the Messiah". But because We are the legitimate heir in principle. And it is about a multitude of circumstances.

    "Anjou".

    The Plantagenets.

    The House of Wessex. "Directly". And Edward the Confessor. "The Norman dynasty". We, after all, are Ragnvald. Also the Blois. And the Plantagenets. Who are the Plantagenets. Anjou. The Direct Capetians — that is Edward III. Anjou — that is Valois-Anjou. This is so, unquestionably. This is Valois. Valois — the claims of the Tudors.

    And the Sobieskis are there. We are the "direct heir" to the Stuarts.

    There is also Denmark. The Oldenburgs. We are "Danish, Norwegian, and Swedish" in principle. And so forth.

    Directly, We are the heir to the House of Hanover and Saxe-Coburg and Gotha. Also to George V — directly. As the "universal heir".

    All of them inherited from the Plantagenets.

    "The Plantagenets".

    In principle, We are the direct heir to the Plantagenets. This is obvious. And in principle, We are the direct heir to the Plantagenets. De la Pole. Absolutely and unconditionally. It is about the Yorks as well. And about the Lancasters. We can consider this topic too.

    Аnd also Brittany. And Scotland.

    And We are also the heir to Savoy. And to the Wittelsbachs. The Stuarts.

    Condé — that is Bathilde d'Orléans. Etc. Bathilde was succeeded by the Duke of Enghien, whom We succeed. He simply swore an oath. No one ever recognized him after his joint renunciation with his father. They are Égalité. We are indifferent to the will of "the last Condé". We are the universal heir with legal titles, "from the reverse side," all the way down to the father who "wrote the will", it is about the sources of law, We are the Grand Condé (moreover, We are the heir to the House of Orléans, already in a "different sense", We are the Count of Paris, and so forth, if one delves into the details). The House of Orléans — the Stuarts.

    And the will, "the last Condé" wrote in his own name. It is about our own rights, and it is about the legal titles themselves. And We are the legitimate heir to His son. And the heir to His father. We are the Great Condé. One can only transfer that which one owns. And the question is what exactly could they inherit after the renunciation. Only a Prince of the Blood could inherit. Otherwise, it is impossible in principle. They publicly renounced. And no one ever officially recognized them. They simply swore an oath. It means nothing. And it looked too much like a murder. And all of this was highly questionable. And contentious. And it took place on the very eve of Louis Philippe's "accession to the throne". And the will was being written "in Our name." And he intended to rewrite it "in Our name."

    We are the Duke of Aumale, Henri. And the question is why the will states the specific name that is stated. The fact that We are the Duke of Aumale is also connected to strict legal circumstances. And the Duke of Bordeaux. This is simply a "legal conflict." Bordeaux remained as an "exception to the rule." Hence, the Duke of Bordeaux.

    The Direct Capetians, essentially. Louis the Lion. Charles of Anjou had an older brother. Artois. The others are between the Direct Capetians. And Artois. Which are inherited. Bourbon-Artois. Dynastic order. Law. Henry II аnd Henry III. Edward III. "Not because We are the Messiah". But because We are the legitimate heir in principle. And it is about a multitude of circumstances. "Anjou". The Plantagenets. The House of Wessex. "Directly". And Edward the Confessor. "The Norman dynasty". We, after all, are Ragnvald. Also the Blois. And the Plantagenets. Who are the Plantagenets. Anjou. The Direct Capetians — that is Edward III. Anjou — that is Valois-Anjou. This is so, unquestionably. This is Valois. Valois — the claims of the Tudors. And the Sobieskis are there. We are the "direct heir" to the Stuarts. There is also Denmark. The Oldenburgs. We are "Danish, Norwegian, and Swedish" in principle. And so forth. Directly, We are the heir to the House of Hanover and Saxe-Coburg and Gotha. Also to George V — directly. As the "universal heir". All of them inherited from the Plantagenets. "The Plantagenets". In principle, We are the direct heir to the Plantagenets. This is obvious. And in principle, We are the direct heir to the Plantagenets. De la Pole. Absolutely and unconditionally. It is about the Yorks as well. And about the Lancasters. We can consider this topic too. Аnd also Brittany. And Scotland. And We are also the heir to Savoy. And to the Wittelsbachs. The Stuarts. Condé — that is Bathilde d'Orléans. Etc. Bathilde was succeeded by the Duke of Enghien, whom We succeed. He simply swore an oath. No one ever recognized him after his joint renunciation with his father. They are Égalité. We are indifferent to the will of "the last Condé". We are the universal heir with legal titles, "from the reverse side," all the way down to the father who "wrote the will", it is about the sources of law, We are the Grand Condé (moreover, We are the heir to the House of Orléans, already in a "different sense", We are the Count of Paris, and so forth, if one delves into the details). The House of Orléans — the Stuarts. And the will, "the last Condé" wrote in his own name. It is about our own rights, and it is about the legal titles themselves. And We are the legitimate heir to His son. And the heir to His father. We are the Great Condé. One can only transfer that which one owns. And the question is what exactly could they inherit after the renunciation. Only a Prince of the Blood could inherit. Otherwise, it is impossible in principle. They publicly renounced. And no one ever officially recognized them. They simply swore an oath. It means nothing. And it looked too much like a murder. And all of this was highly questionable. And contentious. And it took place on the very eve of Louis Philippe's "accession to the throne". And the will was being written "in Our name." And he intended to rewrite it "in Our name." We are the Duke of Aumale, Henri. And the question is why the will states the specific name that is stated. The fact that We are the Duke of Aumale is also connected to strict legal circumstances. And the Duke of Bordeaux. This is simply a "legal conflict." Bordeaux remained as an "exception to the rule." Hence, the Duke of Bordeaux.
    0 Commentarios 0 Acciones 25 Views 0 Vista previa
  • In the context of France. The mother, quite directly, is Anjou-Hungary (-Bosnia). This is simply "Anjou". "The Count of Provence". In my case, this is direct. Simply "Anjou". And Capet. The Capetians — Capet — The Capetians. This is directly "on the father's side". Through the male ancestors of the mother. I am a Kulin-Kotroman. On the father's side. Quite directly. Poland. This is also Anjou (Jadwiga). Louis the Great. And there was a succession there. Valois — Condé. There were also the Longuevilles. Well, the Leszczyńskis and the Bourbons. The Dauphin. This is direct. And through Anjou. I am still the heir to the Valois. This is Valois-Anjou. And the Valois-Orléans dynasty. And these are the Longuevilles. The Longuevilles and the Condé. And in principle, the Leszczyńskis appeared there for a reason. He was the First Prince of the Blood. And they appeared there. This is so. And in reality. As the First Prince of the Blood, We are the King of France. This is without taking into account all the numerous other things. On the mother's side — those who were the legitimate heirs. And on the father's side. France there, and France there.

    In principle, Anjou is Anjou-Valois, it is Valois. Valois. And Valois-Orléans. Directly. Directly, it is precisely the Longuevilles. And the sister of the Great Condé is there. And Conti. And the last in order inherits.

    The Great Condé.

    The First Prince of the Blood, - the King of France.

    This is without taking into account all the numerous other things.

    Of course, We are the heir to Chambord as well. This is obvious. And the heir to his predecessors. This is absolutely obvious. But that is the rest. There is a great deal of the rest.
    In the context of France. The mother, quite directly, is Anjou-Hungary (-Bosnia). This is simply "Anjou". "The Count of Provence". In my case, this is direct. Simply "Anjou". And Capet. The Capetians — Capet — The Capetians. This is directly "on the father's side". Through the male ancestors of the mother. I am a Kulin-Kotroman. On the father's side. Quite directly. Poland. This is also Anjou (Jadwiga). Louis the Great. And there was a succession there. Valois — Condé. There were also the Longuevilles. Well, the Leszczyńskis and the Bourbons. The Dauphin. This is direct. And through Anjou. I am still the heir to the Valois. This is Valois-Anjou. And the Valois-Orléans dynasty. And these are the Longuevilles. The Longuevilles and the Condé. And in principle, the Leszczyńskis appeared there for a reason. He was the First Prince of the Blood. And they appeared there. This is so. And in reality. As the First Prince of the Blood, We are the King of France. This is without taking into account all the numerous other things. On the mother's side — those who were the legitimate heirs. And on the father's side. France there, and France there. In principle, Anjou is Anjou-Valois, it is Valois. Valois. And Valois-Orléans. Directly. Directly, it is precisely the Longuevilles. And the sister of the Great Condé is there. And Conti. And the last in order inherits. The Great Condé. The First Prince of the Blood, - the King of France. This is without taking into account all the numerous other things. Of course, We are the heir to Chambord as well. This is obvious. And the heir to his predecessors. This is absolutely obvious. But that is the rest. There is a great deal of the rest.
    0 Commentarios 0 Acciones 27 Views 0 Vista previa
  • De Villefort.
    De Villefort.
    0 Commentarios 0 Acciones 27 Views 0 Vista previa
  • The Accuser. The Liar. The Slanderer. This is understood. People. People do His will. Samael. His main function is to be the prosecutor at the Divine Judgment. Samael, also Samail, Samael (Ancient Hebrew סמאל‬ ← סַם‎ [sam] "poison" + אֵל‎ [el] "god") is the chief of demons, a destructive force, and the angel of death in the Talmud. He is in eternal confrontation with the archangel Michael (Michaiel). The enmity between the two incorporeal spirits began from the very day Samael was cast down from heaven: the fallen angel attempted to drag Michael down with him into the underworld. They understood nothing. Understood nothing at all. At all. Here lies the "inattentiveness to details".

    Satan (from Assyrian sātānā, Hebrew שָׂטָן‎ satán, Ancient Greek σατανᾶ sataná, Aramaic סטנא satānā, Arabic شيطان‎ shayṭān, Ge'ez śayṭān — "satan(a); adversary; slanderer", from the Northwestern Semitic root *śṭn "satan", lit. "to be hostile", "accusation") in the religious concepts of the Abrahamic religions is the primary adversary of the heavenly forces on earth and in heaven.
    The Accuser. The Liar. The Slanderer. This is understood. People. People do His will. Samael. His main function is to be the prosecutor at the Divine Judgment. Samael, also Samail, Samael (Ancient Hebrew סמאל‬ ← סַם‎ [sam] "poison" + אֵל‎ [el] "god") is the chief of demons, a destructive force, and the angel of death in the Talmud. He is in eternal confrontation with the archangel Michael (Michaiel). The enmity between the two incorporeal spirits began from the very day Samael was cast down from heaven: the fallen angel attempted to drag Michael down with him into the underworld. They understood nothing. Understood nothing at all. At all. Here lies the "inattentiveness to details". Satan (from Assyrian sātānā, Hebrew שָׂטָן‎ satán, Ancient Greek σατανᾶ sataná, Aramaic סטנא satānā, Arabic شيطان‎ shayṭān, Ge'ez śayṭān — "satan(a); adversary; slanderer", from the Northwestern Semitic root *śṭn "satan", lit. "to be hostile", "accusation") in the religious concepts of the Abrahamic religions is the primary adversary of the heavenly forces on earth and in heaven.
    0 Commentarios 0 Acciones 26 Views 0 Vista previa
  • We will certainly learn everything. About everything. Down to the most insignificant details. We treat people with pedantic decency. Honestly. Based on capabilities. We will have absolutely all the capabilities. And we will learn everything. We will have people who will be dedicated to this. We never forget anything.


    "Monte Cristo" — "Condé" — the confluence of rivers. And you had many "iconic" kings. We are legendarily attentive to detail. A Messiah does not mean an idiot. Not at all. Justice does not mean cruelty. The Law. We can do whatever we want, of course. And we will take everything into account. 14 years. These are the ones that are coming to an end. These are complex metamorphoses. This is just literature. And decisiveness. We have been many people.


    The main thing is that you have a monarch. This is the source of the Law. And of everything derived from it. A national mandate. The State. Rights. And Opportunities. Being a subject is a privilege. A privilege. Here lies honor and dignity. And freedom. Woe to those states where We will not rule immediately. We must rule all nations. This is the Law. This is the meaning. Of course, God does not deceive people. And this is fair. Everything here is lawful and fair. Honestly.

    We will certainly learn everything. About everything. Down to the most insignificant details. We treat people with pedantic decency. Honestly. Based on capabilities. We will have absolutely all the capabilities. And we will learn everything. We will have people who will be dedicated to this. We never forget anything. "Monte Cristo" — "Condé" — the confluence of rivers. And you had many "iconic" kings. We are legendarily attentive to detail. A Messiah does not mean an idiot. Not at all. Justice does not mean cruelty. The Law. We can do whatever we want, of course. And we will take everything into account. 14 years. These are the ones that are coming to an end. These are complex metamorphoses. This is just literature. And decisiveness. We have been many people. The main thing is that you have a monarch. This is the source of the Law. And of everything derived from it. A national mandate. The State. Rights. And Opportunities. Being a subject is a privilege. A privilege. Here lies honor and dignity. And freedom. Woe to those states where We will not rule immediately. We must rule all nations. This is the Law. This is the meaning. Of course, God does not deceive people. And this is fair. Everything here is lawful and fair. Honestly.
    0 Commentarios 0 Acciones 26 Views 0 Vista previa
  • 0 Commentarios 0 Acciones 22 Views 0 Vista previa
  • 0 Commentarios 0 Acciones 64 Views 0 Vista previa
Quizás te interese…